11/9/2022 0 Comments Using lelo tor 2He’s not perfectly round like a dildo, more oval-shaped so my estimate was actually right. He is by no means porn-star huge but he is probably considered thicker than average ( I haven’t measured him recently but I believe he’s around 1.6-1.75″ – eta: scratch that, we measured, hehe. It is too tight for my husband – in fact we couldn’t even get it on him. It doesn’t look like it would be waterproof since there is no cover to the charging jack but it is indeed waterproof. It’s definitely the most powerful vibrating cock ring I’ve tried, but I’ve tried very few of them so I don’t feel qualified to agree that it is “100% more powerful than any product of its kind”. If we were to have sex in a position where my clitoris was in contact with the vibrator portion 95% of the time then this vibration strength could be enough to get me to orgasm if I gave it time and had no other distractions. Yes I can confirm that the Tor 2 is at least twice as powerful as the Tor 1 or Bo cock rings. Ok, now we’re getting to something quantitative and realistic. On the site, the copy says “TOR 2 is the world’s first waterproof and rechargeable couples’ ring, boasting 100% more powerful vibrations than any product of its kind.” Any product of its kind? What does that mean? That’s a pretty bold statement to make are they trying to get you to believe it’s more powerful than any cock ring in existence? Or just any “luxury” rechargeable cock ring? Or, as it says on another section ” 100% MORE POWER THAN BEFORE”. The design of the ring itself at its core hasn’t changed – it’s still wide and not really made to work with a clitoris (unless you change your sex position and leave out thrusting) but the vibrations are vastly improved. More effort than I think I’d want to deal with, frankly. #USING LELO TOR 2 PLUS#The plus and minus power buttons are still located on either side of the vibrating portion and do require a little finesse to push. Finally getting in line with the rest of their products and made in body-safe silicone? Yes (albeit to its detriment). Every complaint I’ve had or read about (almost) was addressed. Lelo made a lot of improvements in the design of the Tor II over previous versions. Of course if you planned on using this for more than 2 sessions then you would have to bring the charger with you on your trip but for an overnight getaway it was perfect.Ĭomparing the Lelo Cock Rings: Bo vs Tor vs Tor II That is a little bit disappointing because the case offered a unique element – the cock ring could be charging while covered up and protected, and then it had a protective yet small case that was great for travel. The Tor II that I have now does away with that plastic case and instead you get the standard Lelo satin drawstring bag. Bo and Tor came in a unique and neat little case just big enough to hold the ring, be able to close the lid and have it plugged it to charge (if you set it up in there just right – it was often tricky to get everything lined up “just so”). The other purpose of the movable bit was to conceal the charging jack. It had buttons on the side but then pushing one of them meant that it dislodged the movable portion. From what I can see, the Tor model 1 no longer required the vibrating portion to slide for it to be turned on. This wasn’t easy and had the unfortunate side effect of occasionally clamping a pubic hair in. The design was a bit cumbersome on the Bo: To turn it off and on, you had to slide the hard plastic vibrating portion. The vibrations were surface-buzzy and moderate at best. We were, however, given the Lelo Bo to review a few years ago and while it was seen as an improvement upon the ubiquitous jelly/TPR stretchy, sticky watch-battery jobs the Lelo Bo was underwhelming. I never owned the original Tor because I’m not a cock ring kind of girl and my husband never was impressed by them either.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |